Screening for frailty in older adults using a self-reported instrument / Rastreamento de fragilidade em idosos por instrumento autorreferido

OBJECTIVE To validate a screening instrument using self-reported assessment of frailty syndrome in older adults. METHODS This cross-sectional study used data from the Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento study conducted in Sao Paulo, SP, Southeastern Brazil. The sample consisted of 433 older adult individuals (≥ 75 years) assessed in 2009. The self-reported instrument can be applied to older adults or their proxy respondents and consists of dichotomous questions directly related to each component of the frailty phenotype, which is considered the gold standard model: unintentional weight loss, fatigue, low physical activity, decreased physical strength, and decreased walking speed. The same classification proposed in the phenotype was utilized: not frail (no component identified); pre-frail (presence of one or two components), and frail (presence of three or more components). Because this is a screening instrument, “process of frailty” was included as a category (pre-frail and frail). Cronbach’s α was used in psychometric analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the criterion, the sensitivity, the specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Factor analysis was used to assess the suitability of the proposed number of components. RESULTS Decreased walking speed and decreased physical strength showed good internal consistency (α = 0.77 and 0.72, respectively); however, low physical activity was less satisfactory (α = 0.63). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying pre-frail individuals were 89.7% and 24.3%, respectively, while those for identifying frail individuals were 63.2% and 71.6%, respectively. In addition, 89.7% of the individuals from both the evaluations were identified in the “process of frailty” category. CONCLUSIONS The self-reported assessment of frailty can identify the syndrome among older adults and can be used as a screening tool. Its ...

OBJETIVO Validar instrumento de rastreamento por avaliação autorreferida da síndrome de fragilidade entre idosos. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal com dados do estudo Saúde, Bem-estar e Envelhecimento, realizado em São Paulo, SP. A amostra probabilística foi constituída por 433 idosos (idade ≥ 75 anos) avaliados em 2009. O instrumento autorreferido utilizado pode ser aplicado a idosos ou proxi-informantes e foi composto por questões dicotômicas relacionadas diretamente a cada componente do fenótipo de fragilidade considerado padrão-ouro: perda de peso não intencional, fadiga, baixa atividade física, redução de força e de velocidade de marcha. Manteve-se a classificação proposta no fenótipo: não frágil (nenhum componente identificado); pré-frágil (presença de um ou dois componentes) e frágil (presença de três ou mais componentes). Por tratar-se de instrumento de rastreamento, incluiu-se a categoria processo de fragilização (pré-frágil e frágil). Utilizou-se o coeficiente α de Cronbach na análise psicométrica para avaliar confiabilidade e validade de critério, sensibilidade, especificidade e valores preditivos positivo e negativo. Para verificar a adequação do número de componentes propostos, utilizou-se a análise fatorial. RESULTADOS Os componentes “redução de velocidade de caminhada” e “redução de força” apresentaram boa consistência interna (α = 0,77 e α = 0,72, respectivamente) e a “baixa atividade física” (α = 0,63) foi um pouco menos satisfatória. A sensibilidade e a especificidade para identificação dos pré-frágeis foram de 89,7% e 24,3% e dos frágeis, 63,2% e 71,6%, respectivamente. A categoria “processo de fragilização” identificou, igualmente, 89,7% das pessoas em ambas as avaliações. CONCLUSÕES O instrumento de avaliação de fragilidade autorreferida é capaz de identificar a síndrome entre as pessoas idosas, podendo ser utilizado como instrumento de rastreamento, ...

Study on the Fractionation of Synovial Fluid Protein

Fractionation of protein components of the human synovial fluid was carried out with paper and disc electrophoresis, and isoelectric focusing. The mean ranges of total protein content of synovial fluid obtained in the thirty patients suffering from nonspecific and traumatic synovitis, degenerative osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis were 3.8 to 4.6g/dl. There was no significant difference between each from of arthritis. The pattern of protein fractionation of synovial fluid by paper electrophoresis was similar to that of serum protein. On disc electrophoresis, 20 fractions were identified in synovial fluid and the main fraction was albumin. Isoelectric focusing of the human serum with Ampholine carrier ampholyte in thin layer polyacrylamide gel revealed 27 protein fractions and five isoenzymes of amylase and two of them were the main fractions. In the synovial fluid 22 protein fractions and two isoenzymes of amylase, which had the same isoelectric points as the main fractions of serum, were noted. It is suggested that the isoamylases in the synovial fluid are a dialysate of plasma enzymes.